Interactive Tools

All of Synchronism's interactive tools in one place. Each card shows an epistemic status badge so you know what you're looking at before you click in.

Before the legend: this is a content grouping, not the site's validation badge taxonomy. “Model Explainer” means “shows how the equation works,” not a verdict on whether the equation is correct. “Reparametrization” and “Speculative” here match those two documented descriptive badges — no tool here is certified correct. Level tags use one scale — Beginner / Intermediate / Advanced — plus Artifact Lesson for tools kept deliberately to demonstrate a documented failure (a sign inversion, a geometric convergence) rather than to teach a working relation. (Scale unified 2026-07-23; a “Conceptual” tag previously mixed levels.)

Model ExplainerReparametrizationSpeculative

Coherence Explorer

Model Explainer

Drag γ and ρ_crit sliders and watch the C(ρ) curve update live. See how the sparse/independent → dense/collective transition sharpens or flattens. Best first tool.

Beginner

Galaxy Curve Plotter

Reparametrization

Pick a SPARC galaxy. See four curves: Newtonian prediction (dashed), observed rotation (dots), Synchronism consistency check (violet, fitted to V_flat), and MOND (green). Synchronism and MOND nearly overlap — this is what a reparametrization looks like.

Beginner

γ Calculator

Model Explainer

Input N_corr (number of correlated particles) and read off γ = 2/√N_corr — then see why the formula is audited-negative: the most tightly correlated matter (BCS superconductors, BEC) gets the flattest curves, backwards from real condensed-matter physics. The galaxy preset also refutes the framework's own γ=2 assertion. Presets: gas, liquid, crystal, BCS superconductor, BEC.

Artifact Lesson

Phase Boundary Visualizer

Model Explainer

Drag the γ slider and catch a refuted formula being wrong at every stop — the tool now teaches the audited sign inversion as its lesson (real BCS/BEC transitions are among nature's sharpest; the formula files them at the flat end). Each regime card carries a live reality-check line. Note: the axis here is γ, not coherence C.

Artifact Lesson

Equation Anatomy

Model Explainer

Step-by-step breakdown of C(ρ) = tanh(γ·ln(ρ/ρcrit + 1)). Each step shows one equation component, its physical motivation, and why the specific functional form was chosen (not derived).

Beginner

Chemistry Correlation Explorer

Reparametrization

See how γ correlates with chemical properties across 1,703 phenomena. High r values (0.98+) reflect density-monotonicity, not Synchronism-specific physics — the tool shows the null model (2-parameter polynomial in Z) alongside the data, and the null matches or beats it.

Advanced

Where to start: Coherence Explorer (Model Explainer) → Galaxy Plotter (Reparametrization) → Honest Assessment. “Model Explainer” is a content grouping (tools that show how the equation works), not a validation badge — no tool here certifies the model as correct; see the badge definitions on the Honest Assessment.The six tools above are grounded in the framework's core theory or known reparametrizations.

Speculative — Read Before Using

The tool below illustrates a speculative hypothesis with no empirical calibration. The convergence it displays is a mathematical property of the sigmoid, not an empirical finding about consciousness. Expert reviewers have flagged it as the site's largest credibility liability. It is included for completeness with full disclosure.

Consciousness Threshold Demo

Speculative

Watch 8 "independent" approaches converge on C ≈ 0.50 — because they share one assumption. The convergence is geometric, not empirical: any approach keyed to the midpoint of a [0,1)-bounded range lands near 0.50 by construction. The threshold is untestable as stated (no calibration to EEG/fMRI/IIT/PCI* exists; the one cited test measured a different variable). An artifact lesson, not a finding about consciousness.

Artifact Lesson