Test Roadmap

Untested — 24 Proposed Experiments
Validation Badge Guide — MRH-relationship: ■ Active-MRH — under active investigation  | ■ Parallel-Paths — competing approaches  | ■ Sidelined — deprioritised  | ■ Superseded — replaced by better framing  | ■ Audited-Negative — closed as wrong. Descriptive: ■ Reparametrization — known result in new notation  | ■ Untested — no data yet  | ■ Speculative — reasoning gap  | ■ Failed — falsified by data. Canonical definitions →
Pre-registration status: None of these 24 experiments have been formally pre-registered before the data was available. This means results cannot be treated as prospective predictions — they are retrospective consistency checks until a kill criterion is publicly registered before the relevant dataset is analyzed. See the prediction audit trail →
Discrimination status (restated 2026-07-27): Of these 24 proposed tests, 0 could select Synchronism over MOND+EFE+ΛCDM. That is the accurate claim. The blunter form this box used to carry — “0 discriminate” — was false, and contradicted Tier 1: 2 executed tests did discriminate, and both selected MOND (TEST-09, BTFR slope, separating the models at 3.3σ; TEST-10, dwarf DM fractions). A test that separates two models is discriminating regardless of which one wins. The remaining Tier-1 tests are self-eliminating (no outcome selects Synchronism), failed by sign, or genuinely non-discriminating (the RAR transition shape, where free-γ curves coincide). The roadmap represents proposed tests, not tests that are ready to run or are expected to discriminate. A third executed result (TEST-25, added 2026-07-28) is a different kind of kill — not Synchronism-vs-MOND discrimination, but an internal-consistency squeeze: the SPARC-preferred γ interval and the Cassini Solar-System bound have a robust empty intersection under the scale-universal tanh-log QUMOND realization (+17.7–18.0σ discrepancy across the retained grid). Scoped narrowly to that realization; see Tier 1 for the full statement. See Tier 1 for per-test verdicts →
Protocol status — the “unrunnable” verdict, propagated (2026-07-18): No protocol maps any laboratory or astronomical observable to the coherence value C, in any domain (the site's own adjudication — see For Researchers and Key Claims). Every Tier 2 and Tier 4 experiment whose outcome depends on measuring C — the EEG, circadian, and QC-coherence pilots included — is therefore unrunnable as stated: funding one at the listed $50K–$500K would buy a measurement of a variable the framework has already ruled uninterpretable as C. These entries stay listed as what they are — proposals pending a calibration protocol that does not exist — not as fundable tests. An external review flagged this page as presenting them as fundable; this box is the correction.

Synchronism has defined 24 specific, falsifiable experiments organized into four tiers by cost and feasibility. Every experiment has an explicit kill criterion — a result that would falsify the prediction. This page covers proposed tests; for results on what has actually been analyzed, see below.

Tests use one flat namespace: TEST-01 … TEST-24 across the four tiers (Tier 1 = 01–10, Tier 2 = 11–14, Tier 3+ = 15–24), plus TEST-25, the Cassini/SPARC squeeze added out-of-band 2026-07-28. Suffixes: a = amended sub-test registered after the parent was withdrawn (TEST-04a); s = substituted protocol, run on a different sample than the one registered (TEST-03s). Both suffixes mark a test that is not the registered one and must not be read as the parent's result. (Namespace and suffix grammar stated here 2026-08-10, after a visitor Pass 3 found TEST-11 denoting two unrelated experiments and Pass 2 found the suffix convention undocumented. The Cassini squeeze was renumbered 11 → 25 to clear the collision.) Tier 1 cards live on the Tier 1 page (each test card has an anchor: e.g., /tier-1-existing#TEST-04a). Cross-references elsewhere on the site to TEST-NN resolve directly to those cards.

What's Already Been Analyzed

The “0 Completed” count below refers to the 24 proposed experiments above — none have been run as formal pre-registered tests. Separately, the framework has been checked against existing datasets with these results:

  • RAR transition shape (2807 SPARC points, 2026-05-21): γ=2 compander refuted at ΔBIC=+184; free-γ=0.49=MOND — FAILED (γ=2); collapses to MOND at fitted γ (curve-equivalence only — the field equation is postulated in the archive, not derived, and the version stated there is eliminated a priori — corrected 2026-08-09 from “no action, no Lagrangian, no dynamics”). Net discriminating galaxy tests vs MOND: 0.
  • Galaxy rotation (14,760 galaxies, SPARC + ALFALFA-SDSS): qualitative curve match — MOND reparametrization, not novel
  • TEST-03 TFR scatter: NEVER RUN AS REGISTERED — the R² = 0.14 figure previously reported here was a metric conflation (morphology statistic on N ≈ 171, not the registered test on N = 14,585; corrected 2026-07-09). The environment claim was later executed 2026-07-14 (research repo): r² = 0.0001, ~900× under the framework's >20% claim — environment prediction REFUTED by execution. But not as registered (declared 2026-07-27): that run used N = 141 SPARC galaxies vs Cosmicflows-4 ambient density, not the registered N = 14,585 ALFALFA-SDSS cluster/field/void classification — different dataset, different proxy, ~100× smaller sample. It is designated TEST-03s and the registered TEST-03 remains unrun and runnable. Read the census as 3 registered kills + 1 substituted-protocol kill, not 4 identical ones
  • DESI fσ₈ (TEST-04a): UNDERPOWERED AS REGISTERED (corrected 2026-07-14: the registered fσ₈(z=0.51) > 0.46 criterion was met at only ~1.5σ, short of the demanded >3σ; the widely-quoted 2.4σ disfavor is on σ₈, a GR-conditioned statistic that cannot falsify modified growth; DESI's own MG analysis gives μ₀ within 1σ of zero. Not counted in the refutation census. DR2 both-outcome pre-commitment registered 2026-07-17 — the program's first prospective registration)
  • Chemistry boundary consistency (1,703 phenomena): 89% consistent — calibration set, not blind test
  • Superconductivity (η factor): reproduces Abrikosov-Gor'kov formula — reparametrization
  • Born rule: reproduces |α|² via coherence conservation — reparametrization (no deviation predicted)
Full ledger: wins, failures, and reparametrizations →

Overview by Tier

Tier 1: Existing Data

10 tests

Reanalysis of public datasets (Gaia DR3, SPARC, SDSS, DESI). No new hardware needed.

Cost: $0  •  Timeline: 1–6 months

Tier 2: Pilot Experiments

4 tests

Small-scale experiments: EEG studies, circadian rhythm monitoring, QC coherence tests. ⚠ Every C-dependent entry is unrunnable as stated — no protocol maps any observable to C (see the protocol-status box above).

Cost: $50K–$500K  •  Timeline: 6–24 months

Tier 3: Major Experiments

7 tests

Dedicated facilities: gravitational wave correlation, multi-messenger astronomy, controlled decoherence.

Cost: $1M–$10M  •  Timeline: 2–5 years

Tier 4: Frontier

3 tests

Pushing technology limits: minimal cell γ mapping, cosmic interference detection, consciousness in AI.

Cost: $10M+  •  Timeline: 5+ years

Recommendation

Update (2026-07-08): the zero-cost Tier 1 recommendations have all been run or closed. (Scoped to this box's three recommendations — it does not mean no further $0 analysis exists; see the a₀(z) epoch fork on Parameter Derivations, added 2026-07-29, which remains unregistered and may be unrunnable rather than closed.) An earlier version of this box recommended starting with three existing-data tests; all three have since been adjudicated. BAO coherence modulation: Withdrawn 2026-05-04 (internal contradiction, never adjudicated). SPARC environment analysis (TEST-03): Never run as registered (the old “R² = 0.14 kill” was a metric conflation, corrected 2026-07-09); the registered environment claim was executed 2026-07-14 with r² = 0.0001 — refuted. Wide binaries (TEST-02): Self-Eliminating-or-Tie — the predicted 0.05–0.4% signal sits ~80× below Gaia DR3 systematics, and either outcome of the ongoing Chae-vs-Banik dispute is covered by Newton or MOND respectively, so no result selects this framework. See Honest Assessment and Tier 1: Existing Data.

Status

24

Proposed

0

Pre-registered & Completed

10

Zero Cost

The “Pre-registered & Completed: 0” counts only tests whose kill criterion was registered before the relevant dataset was analyzed. This is distinct from the retrospective analyses in the “What's Already Been Analyzed” box above (galaxy rotation, chemistry, TEST-03/04a). Those analyses produced results, but they were not pre-registered prospective predictions.

Tier 1: Existing Data →Top 5 Decisive Tests

Related Concepts

Tier 1: Existing Data10 tests using available datasetsTier 2: Pilot Experiments4 tests, $50K–$200K eachTop 5 Decisive TestsBAO, wide binary, anesthesia, GW-DM, cosmic interference