Top 5 Decisive Tests

Most Discriminating

Of the 24 defined experiments, these five have the highest distinguishing power — they can discriminate between Synchronism, ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter), MOND, and standard frameworks. Ranked by decisiveness.

1

BAO (Baryon Acoustic Oscillation) Coherence Modulation

Tier 1$0

Standard cosmology predicts zero density dependence of BAO peak position. Synchronism predicts ~10⁻⁴ shift. This is a clean discriminator with no ambiguity.

Kill: BAO identical everywhere to 10⁻⁵ precision

2

Wide Binary Density Dependence

Tier 1$0

MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) predicts density-independent anomaly. Synchronism predicts density-dependent. Uses existing Gaia DR3 data. The cleanest test of environment dependence.

Kill: Anomaly independent of local stellar density

3

EEG (Electroencephalography) Anesthesia Phase Transition

Tier 2$150K

Tests the most striking consciousness prediction: consciousness loss is a phase transition, not gradual decline. If the threshold is universal, the entire consciousness framework has empirical support.

Kill: Consciousness loss is gradual with no threshold clustering

4

Gravitational Wave Speed–Dark Matter Column Correlation

Tier 3$1M–$5M

General relativity predicts exactly zero correlation between gravitational wave (GW) propagation and dark matter distribution. Any nonzero signal would be revolutionary. From GW170817: α < 3.0 × 10⁻¹⁵.

Kill: No correlation at 10⁻¹⁶ level after 20+ events

5

Cosmic Interference Patterns

Tier 1$0

Unique to Synchronism. No other framework predicts oscillatory modulation in galaxy cluster separations at λ ~ 500 Mpc. If found, it would be strong evidence for the coherence interpretation.

Kill: No oscillations above 3σ out to 2000 Mpc

The Strategy

Three of the top five are Tier 1 (zero cost). Start there. If all three fail, Synchronism's cosmological predictions are dead and no further investment is warranted. If any succeed, they fund the case for TEST-11 (EEG, $150K) and eventually TEST-15 (GW correlation, $1M+).

This is how science should work: cheapest tests first, escalate only on success.

Publication Roadmap →Full Catalog

Prerequisites

Understanding these concepts first will help:

Test Catalog24 specific experiments by tier

Related Concepts

Tier 1: Existing Data10 tests using available datasetsTier 2: Pilot Experiments4 tests, $50K–$200K each