Publication Roadmap
12 Manuscripts TrackedSynchronism tracks potential publications with readiness scores and circularity percentages. Higher readiness means closer to submission. Lower circularity means more genuinely novel content.
Cosmology / Astrophysics
ALFALFA-SDSS TFR Scatter Reduction
0.97Novelty: 51% scatter improvementCircularity: 8.8%
CDM vs MOND Discrimination (σ_int)
0.95Novelty: MOND rejected at 32σCircularity: 15%
SPARC Capstone (175 galaxies)
0.92Novelty: Unified rotation curve frameworkCircularity: 25%
Dark Matter as Incomplete Decoherence
0.88Novelty: Paradigm reframeCircularity: 40%
Wide Binary Density Prediction
0.60Novelty: Novel testable predictionCircularity: 5%
Chemistry / Materials
γ Framework: 1,703 Phenomena
0.75Novelty: Unified property scalingCircularity: 60%
η Pair-Breaking as Design Target
0.65Novelty: Materials optimizationCircularity: 80%
Channel Independence Discovery
0.50Novelty: γ_phonon ⊥ γ_spin findingCircularity: 10%
Consciousness / Philosophy
Consciousness Threshold (C ≈ 0.50)
0.60Novelty: 8-way convergenceCircularity: 30%
34 Falsifiable Predictions
0.55Novelty: EEG protocols definedCircularity: 15%
Methodology
A2ACW Protocol
0.70Novelty: AI-AI adversarial collaborationCircularity: 0%
Autonomous Research Report
0.65Novelty: 3,308 sessions methodologyCircularity: 0%
Key Insight
The papers with the highest readiness (ALFALFA-SDSS, CDM discrimination) also have the lowest circularity. The empirical results stand regardless of whether Synchronism's theoretical framework is correct.
The papers with highest circularity (η pair-breaking, γ framework) are explicit about their reparametrization status. We don't claim novelty where there is none.
Submission Status
No manuscripts have been submitted externally. The roadmap represents internal readiness assessment. External peer review will be the real test.