The Publisher Track
Superseded — Manuscript scores: February 2026 snapshotSynchronism tracks publication readiness for every potential manuscript using automated scoring. This ensures honest assessment of what's ready for external review and what still needs work.
Readiness Scoring
Each manuscript is scored from 0.0 to 1.0 based on:
- Derivation completeness — are all parameters derived or honestly labeled as fitted?
- Empirical validation — has the prediction been tested against data?
- Failure documentation — are limitations and failures explicitly stated?
- Kill criteria — are falsification conditions defined?
- Circularity check — what percentage of the work is reparametrization vs. novelty?
Top Manuscripts
ALFALFA-SDSS TFR Scatter
Draft complete • arXiv astro-ph
CDM Discrimination (σ_int)
Draft complete • arXiv astro-ph
SPARC Capstone
Draft complete • arXiv astro-ph
Dark Matter as Incomplete Decoherence
v1 complete • AASTeX 6.3
Chemistry γ Framework
Outline • TBD
Consciousness Threshold (C ≈ 0.50)
Outline • TBD
The Circularity Check
Every manuscript must report its circularity percentage — how much of the result is known physics rewritten in Synchronism notation vs. genuinely novel prediction.
Example: The ALFALFA-SDSS paper has only 8.8% circularity (very low). The 51% TFR scatter improvement is a genuine, testable claim. The dark matter paper has higher circularity because C(ρ) is partly a relabeling of existing parameters.
Honest Caveat
No manuscripts have been submitted externally yet. Readiness scores are self-assessed. External peer review may reveal issues not caught by internal assessment.