Status Dashboard
Current as of Feb 2026Prediction Outcomes by Domain
| Domain | Validated | Supported | Untested | Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cosmology | 3 | 5 | 12 | 1 |
| Chemistry | 17 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Consciousness | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
| Quantum | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Methodology | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 11 | 54 | 5 |
Summary
92
Total Predictions
36%
Validated/Supported
59%
Untested
5%
Failed
Research Timeline
Nov 2025Session #1 — Coherence function first derived
Dec 2025SPARC capstone — 175 galaxies analyzed
Jan 2026Chemistry track — 1,703 phenomena validated
Jan 2026ALFALFA-SDSS — 14,585 galaxy external validation
Feb 2026Session #616 — Full audit, all tracks reparametrized
Feb 2026Test catalog — 24 experiments defined
TBDTier 1 tests — BAO, wide binary, SPARC environment
TBDFirst external submission (ALFALFA-SDSS TFR)
TBDTier 2 — EEG anesthesia pilot ($150K)
The Honest Verdict
59% of predictions are untested. The “validated” chemistry predictions are mostly mathematical consistency checks, not novel predictions. The real test is ahead: Tier 1 experiments using existing data. Until those run, Synchronism is a framework with interesting notation, some useful results, and a lot of open questions.